bivalence substitutable with tautology via temporal extinction (venn, anton & matt)

Note to self about this video: when you get to the point of trying to tie dreamless sleep to a justification of 'imaging that we could have not been" you need to first state that dreamless sleep is a subjective claim and tie IT to an empty set ( ) and compare that firstly to observing the neuro firings of a sleeping person as a presence of activity (x).[such that ( ) the empty set takes president over the present set (x). and that definitions of dreaming sleep and non dreaming sleep are analogous to: the analogy or fact of our presence means that we were selected aka (x) presence, but imagining that we weren't selected and hence imagining our non-presence ( ) is a form of substitution. And that when looking at the science of natural selection substituting the presence with one's absence in retrospect is a freedom of imagination as opposed to a tautology of presence. In otherwords if Anton wants to say that evolution is true and points to presence in much the same tautological fashion of stating 'the survival of those who survive" then he believes in evolution strictly as change but not as chance, luck, fitness etc. aka 'survival of the fittest' or selection. Venn diagrams. Misrepresentation of others arguments as, not a falsifying of their arguments, but a glib transparent overlay. Holding hostage others via misrepresentation until they more logically disclose what they are hiding. As if they are more or less than their expressions and doinks. I figured I'd get off my chest a sort of systematic thought pattern I was having about Anton and Matt this morning again using apophantic apodetic thoughts in order to explain my thoughts about a possible abuse of Natural Selection as having a teleology or determinability or fulfillment prophetic modality.
This video was sort of a cathartic getting off my chest some thoughts about what's up with Anton as our resident babble fish and matt as our resident cosmologist while at the same time, wasting my time not accomplishing any new art works. Natural selection as a ontic thereness, which we claim happens like the orbits of planets, "IS" theorized as being "the case" regardless and prior to us, and therefore with the prospect of us, as a human population, having never been. Being looked at in terms of chance and in competition-with other organisms we were therefore vulnerable to extinction prior to our presence.(?) Natural Selection as a benign unthinking non fulfilling occurrence that has happened to us and this world. (The confusion of how our unimaginability of our own absence conflicts (or jack-knife's) with such supposedly objective descriptions of biological science, reveals perhaps an abuse of the regular discourse of science and it's limits and purpose via cosmological pontifications). I do ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dxga3n6s9Mw