Alternatives to Linux in the future — What to use if Linux goes bad?
awuuwa
Alternatives to Linux in the future
Who knows what may happen in the future, perhaps one day the Linux kernel will go bad. So what are the options to consider if such a thing were to occur. Here in this speech I go trough 3 options.
fragmentation is good: https://odysee.com/@awuuwa:9/fragmentation-is-actually-good-not-bad:2
Permissive licenses are bad: https://odysee.com/@awuuwa:9/permissive-licenses-are-evil:1
Linux sucks because it's monolithic: https://odysee.com/@awuuwa:9/Linux-sucks-because-it-is-monolithic:a
Debian GNU/Hurd in 2023: https://odysee.com/@awuuwa:9/Debian-GNU-Hurd-2023:5
0:00 an uncertain future 2:05 FreeBSD and other BSD systems 7:02 illumos/OpenIndiana 11:11 would OI work 13:14 OI development slow 13:47 OI better in the future? 15:27 OI has a strong foundation 17:08 licensing 20:51 recommendations are Unix-like 21:30 Hurd, GNU's own kernel 23:33 microkernels offer potential 27:31 microkernels are awesome 29:13 existing target audience 29:59 Debian GNU/Hurd 32:37 Hurd may be a massive future success 36:28 predicting a future
Free/Libre software is software that respects the user's freedom. Software that meets the "4 Freedoms" is considered free/libre. The free software movement was started by Richard Stallman to to pursue the liberation of cyberspace. To create a free digital world for computers users. Richard Stallman started the GNU project to develop an operating system for this, and pioneered the concept of copyleft with their GNU GPL license. Copyleft is a specific kind of a free/libre license that guarantees the user's freedom is preserved when the software exchanges hands.
Visit GNU.org https://www.gnu.org
file details: FLAC audio 48khz 16bit mono PNG image 640x360
108225437 Bytes