GSCSP - Prof Ulrike Kammerer, The Laboratory Pandemic

Gold Standard Covid Science in Practice An Interdisciplinary Symposium calling for immediate intervention Presented by Doctors for Covid Ethics Hosted by UK Column July 29th and 30th 2021

Complete Symposium recordings—both film and audio-only—with link references and critical analysis: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/GSCSP-CallForImmedIntervention.html

DAY 1 **Session I: The False Pandemic ** Session II: The Going Direct Reset DAY 2 Session III: First Do Not Harm Session IV: The Hour of Justice Closing Panel Session

Prof Ulrike Kammerer, The Laboratory Pandemic

Professor Ulrike Kammerer PhD is a Molecular Virologist and Immunologist. She is Associate Professor of Experimental Reproductive Immunology and Tumor Biology at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wurzburg, Germany.

Source: https://doctors4covidethics.org/save-the-date-covid-19-interdisciplinary-symposium/

From The PCR Disaster Genesis and Evolution of the »Drosten Test« https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Corodok1_PCREnglish-Feb2021.pdf »Truth is like water: it will find its way« https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Corodok1_PCREnglish-Feb2021.pdf#page=79

The Corona Committee founded by the four lawyers Viviane Fischer, Antonia Fischer, Dr Reiner Fullmich and Dr Justus Hoffmann met on 5 February 2021 in its 38th session on the topic »Attack on People and Society«.1 2 The biologist Prof. Ulrike Kammerer, who belongs to the group of scientists demanding that the medical journal Eurosurveillance withdraw the PCR protocol for the »Drosten Test«, was invited. At the meeting, she reported on the journal’s decision the previous day. This is the edited version of her report.

https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Corodok1_PCREnglish-Feb2021.pdf#page=82

What I like is: »This is the proof that science is dead now«. And it really is like that, i. e. it no longer has anything to do with what you used to learn: you write a scientific publication or a letter to the editor or a critique, and then reviewers come and tell you: yes, you’re right about that and you’re wrong about that, that point is also stupid and now take a stand on it again. So, none of that works any more, but in fact, and that is also our conviction, that is why we all continue. The research community that works against it or with us is getting bigger and bigger. »But truth is like water, it will find its way.«

And that’s it, I think, and that’s how we have to work. As I said, there are also a lot of good letters that say: »That’s exactly it«. So this energy that’s coming out, that you just say, »Guys, we need to unite globally and sort of put more weight behind the evidence behind things again, because so far it’s all just eminence«, i. e. people are put in the foreground and they proclaim the truth from above. That can’t really be the case in science. That’s why we have a kind of »movement« here that you can’t really call »movement«, but we have already put an idea into the world: unbiased science, where such people can also report.