Why Libertarians Will Never Stop Arguing About Immigration
IvanTheHeathen
Libertarians will never stop arguing about immigration because a vagueness problem lies at the very heart of their interminable arguments about what the proper immigration policy is, given the existence of a state. Which policy will result in greater or lesser rights violations overall is unclear, and since both policies violate some rights, we have no choice but to resort to utilitarian bean-counting to resolve the problem - hence, unavoidable vagueness. Without solving the broader metaphysical issue of vagueness (which doesn't seem likely), these debates between libertarians will never end.
REFERENCES
- "Vagueness" (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy):
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vagueness/
- "The Problem of the Many" (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy):
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/problem-of-many/
- "Sorities Paradox" (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy):
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/
- "Vagueness," by Timothy Williamson:
- "The Case for Free Trade and Restricted Immigration," by hans-Hermann Hoppe:
https://mises.org/system/tdf/13_2_8_0.pdf?file=1&type=document
- "A Libertarian Case for Free Immigration," by Walter Block:
https://mises.org/system/tdf/13_2_4_0.pdf?file=1&type=document
- "On Immigration: Reply to Hoppe," by Walter Block:
https://mises.org/system/tdf/21_3_2.pdf?file=1&type=document
- "Are there Grounds for Limiting Immigration?," by Julian Simon:
http://direct.mises.org/sites/default/files/13_2_2_0.pdf
- "A Libertarian Argument Against Open Borders," by John Hospers:
https://mises.org/system/tdf/13_2_3_0.pdf?file=1&type=document ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwUTDA3stfc
329982942 Bytes